"I have been reading your amazing blog and listening to some of your podcasts with Carolyn. Not sure how I haven't run across your work before. Amazing stuff." (reader's comment, 10 May 2016)
Come chat with us! Download and install an IRC-client -- Hexchat is recommended -- and go to the channel #National-Socialism on the Undernet server.

23 November 2013

Basic Facts about the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy


Oswald, in custody, gives the Communist clenched-fist salute.


Oliver Stone is a half-Jew film-director who showed very clearly with his Untold History of the United States, which he wrote and narrated for HBO in 2012, that he is very partial to the Soviet Union and Marxists in general. There is an obvious emphasis in his history on what he understands to be the positive role of the far left and the Soviet Union, with some negative observations about the capitalist West to help the Communists to look even better. The point is not to say that Stone's work is thoroughly false, but that he has an agenda and a bias. That is clear.

In his 1991 historical drama JFK* (which I found tedious, contrary to the enormous praise heaped upon it) Stone pursued the same agenda. For the far left, the JFK assassination is a problem, because Lee Harvey Oswald was a self-proclaimed Marxist.  Stone's effort was essentially to restore credence to the old Soviet propaganda-line that Kennedy had been assassinated by right-wing racists. In the time between the assassination and the capture of Oswald, this was the accepted interpretation, that racists had killed Kennedy. That's what the world would have continued to believe if self-proclaimed Marxist Oswald had not been discovered as the assassin.

Since Stone's JFK, there has been a revived effort to sweep Oswald's far-left affiliation under the rug, but contemporary news-reports show it as an undeniable fact. Oswald was a self-proclaimed Marxist who subscribed to the Communist Party's newspaper, the Worker. That President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by a Marxist used to be, and should still be, a matter of common knowledge.


General Edwin Walker
On 10 April 1963, months before the Kennedy assassination, Oswald had tried to murder General Edwin Walker. General Walker was a prominent opponent of forced racial integration who lived in Dallas. Oswald had shot at Walker through a window of his home. Ballistics showed that a bullet from this incident was consistent with the characteristics of the Carcano rifle later used to shoot Kennedy. Oswald's culpability was confirmed by evidence given after Oswald's death by his widow, including Oswald's handwritten note to his wife from the night of the attempted murder. Oswald's motive, as he later explained to his wife, had been that Walker was a "fascist" and leader of a "fascist organization." This was a Communist way of saying that General Walker opposed forced racial integration.

Subsequently, one can see Oswald's motive in killing Kennedy as a kind of false-flag operation, because it was well known that there was much anger at Kennedy in the South over his anti-White policies, and it was predictable that Southern right-wing racists would be blamed if President Kennedy were assassinated in Dallas. This was obviously an intended effect -- and the deception would have been successful if Oswald had not subsequently killed policeman J.D. Tippit, thereafter becoming a suspect in the presidential assassination as well.

Where the conspiracy-theorists may be right is in doubting the Warren Commission's assertion that Lee Harvey Oswald had no co-conspirators and in suspecting the motives behind it, Earl Warren having been a notoriously leftist Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. When Jewish nightclub-owner Jack Ruby shot Oswald, the obvious inference was that Oswald had been shot to keep him from revealing secrets. This was General Walker's observation at the time (UPI 20 December 1963). There were several witnesses (including Janet "Jada" Conforto and Beverly Oliver) to the fact that Ruby and Oswald knew each other. The intervention of Jack Ruby in silencing Lee Harvey Oswald is the most obvious indication that there was a conspiracy, but probably not one about which the kinds of people who enjoyed Oliver Stone's JFK would really want to know.
_______________________
* JFK was released by Regency Films, a production-company newly created by Arnon Milchan, now admitted to have been an Israeli agent (Harriet Sherwood, "Arnon Milchan reveals past as Israeli spy," The Guardian, 26 November 2013)

13 November 2013

19% Negro? No way.

Trisha producer Alyson DiFranco




Recently White racial activist Craig Cobb appeared on NBC's Trisha show, where another guest, neurotic mulatto Herman Williams III (brother of Montel Williams) asserted that everybody in the entire world had Negro ancestors and therefore carried Negro DNA. This is an absurd claim. But the absurd claim was subsequently supported by the even more absurd claim that Trisha's producer, the pink-skinned and fine-featured Alyson DiFranco, had been shown by a genetic test to have 19% "Subsaharan" DNA. Everybody of course understood "Subsaharan" to mean Negro. That is how it was meant to be understood. "Subsaharan" had to be taken to mean Negro, because otherwise Herman Williams' claim would not have been validated.

Based on her general appearance, it is practically impossible that Miss DiFranco has anywhere near 19% Negro genes. Any old-fashioned White person from the South would have laughed at this claim, because we know (as Madison Grant observed a century ago in The Passing of the Great Race) that a person that is half-Black and half-White looks completely Black, and it is only after many generations of dilution that Negroid characteristics cease to be detectable. At 19% Negro Miss DiFranco would be an obvious mulatta. Since she is far from that, an appropriate response to that imputation would have been something along the lines of: I may have been born at night, but it wasn't last night.

A typical one-eighth (12.5%) Negro, with broad, flat nose, kinky hair, etc. This person could not have passed for White.*
For some reason though -- maybe he was still thinking about the cleavage that Miss DiFranco had displayed while interviewing him in Leith -- Craig Cobb evidently did not suspect anything rotten, and, when the host asked him to submit to a DNA test like that taken by Miss DiFranco, Mr. Cobb agreed to it. Predictably, they announced that Craig Cobb had some "Subsaharan" genes too -- although only 14% in his case.

What's going on here? Are they making it up?

Most likely the claim of "Subsaharan DNA" is a half-truth, calculated to give the unwary public a false impression. The word "Subsaharan," is not a racial term. It is a geographic term.

Since prehistoric times there have been people of White ancestry in Africa. These are the Berbers and their mixed-race descendants, who are found especially in Somalia (which is geographically Subsaharan) and Morocco, but also to some extent throughout eastern and northern Africa. Most Berbers today are mongrelized, but some only to a slight degree. Especially those Berbers living within the seclusion of  mountain-ranges often retain even today the blue eyes and blond hair of their ancestors, who migrated from Europe into Africa during the Ice Age.

A Moroccan Berber family.
The fact that most people do not know the extent and antiquity of White heritage in Africa has been exploited for propaganda-purposes before.  In 2010 Belgian journalist Jean-Paul Mulders insinuated that Adolf Hitler had some Negro ancestry based on the fact that he carried a Y-chromosome that is also carried by some people in Africa. So as not to defeat his own propaganda, Mulders omitted to mention that the same Y-chromosome has a substantial presence in Europe, especially in the Balkans. The deception consisted in pretending that White DNA found in both Europe and Africa was really Negro DNA that somehow made its way into Europe (magically, without bringing any observable Negroid characteristics with it).

My guess is that this is the kind of game that the Trisha show is playing. 
________________
* It seems necessary to show such an illustration of a typical one-eighth Negro for clarification, because many Americans today seem not to realize how dilute is the Negro ancestry of the "African Americans" that they regularly see on television. When an octoroon on television is called "African American" and then through further mixing produces a child that can pass for White (to the unobservant) and is erroneously called "half-Black," the public gets a falsely optimistic picture of how easy it might be for Negroid characteristics to be bred out.


Upload MP3 and download MP3 using free MP3 hosting from Tindeck. 

08 November 2013

How the Jews Invented McCarthyism

Senator McCarthy heeds the instrument of his downfall.




There are mainstream accounts of the political career of Senator Joseph R. McCarthy that make no bones about the fact that the overwhelming majority of federal employees that he exposed as posing a security-risk were Jews. McCarthy had hardly gained notice as an anti-Communist before he was being called anti-Semitic and compared to Hitler, for example by a syndicated columnist who described McCarthyism thus:

This plot was anti-Semitic in origin and intention, following the crooked logic of the fascist-minded, who say that all Communists are Jews and, therefore, all Jews are Communists. [Marquis Childs, 27 December 1950]

Obviously it was widely understood that a very large portion (of course not "all") of Communists and pro-Communists were Jews; otherwise the complaint that McCarthyism was intrinsically anti-Semitic would make no sense. For some reason, however, it has been the practice of lame conservatives, when writing about McCarthy, to avoid mentioning that fact, as if it were not long-established common knowledge.

Whom do these lame conservatives think they are fooling by not saying that most of the security-risks that McCarthy discovered were Jews? Certainly they are not fooling Jews, who already know it. This kind of tippy-toeing around key facts only allows the non-Jewish majority to remain in amnesia and confusion about what happened.

As a matter of fact, the overwhelming Jewishness of Communism in the United States is the central fact in Senator McCarthy's rise and fall, and the key to understanding what happened to him.

George Lincoln Rockwell's This Time the World recounts DeWest Hooker's explanation of how Jews set up and then brought down the anti-Communist crusade of  Senator Joseph McCarthy. Here is a spoken summary of it, emphasizing the moral of the story, from a talk that Rockwell gave in 1965:


And here is the excerpt from Rockwell's book, with more detail (and a correction from me):

My first meeting with Hooker was on a Thanksgiving Day, when he was due at a family dinner, but we got so totally absorbed in our discussion that he kept his wife waiting hours, until she was very angry at him. As we talked, he told me one amazing thing after the other.

Wes explained the Jews to me more clearly than I had ever figured out before. He described, with dramatic gestures, how they operate like a snake with different skins, which they crawl out of or into as the strategic need may arise.

When Jewish Communism begins to get too "hot," as it has here in the U.S., because of the millions who saw the parade of Jew Communist spies, they slide out of that skin and become Zionists. And when this also gets too hot, then they molt and become "anti-communists" or something else. In the excitement, nobody ever seems to notice that it is always the same snake.

Even more enlightening, he gave me a sparkling clear picture of the mess I had come to know on my own as the "movement" -- the cowards, the loud-mouths, the hobbyists, the ADL agents, the "prostitutes" who make money out of it -- the whole depressing lot of them.  

This energetic young genius then told me the astonishing and accurate inside story of Joe McCarthy, completely winning me with his way of fathoming and presenting the vital information about enemy operations which had so far baffled me. Every step of the way, he showed me documents, newspaper clippings and photostats to back up the story about how Joe McCarthy got started, rose, and was finally ruined.

He told me that Bernard Baruch had started it all, when too many Jew spies were becoming prominent. Baruch called Joe up to his New York apartment -- here, Hooker showed me a clipping from The New York Times -- and told him that there was need of an anti-communist crusade, but that there was an unfortunate idea getting around that Communism was Jewish, because of so many Jew spies. Would Joe conduct a good, exciting Red hunt, being a little "fairer" by digging up some non-Jewish spies? If Joe would do this, Bernie would see that there was good publicity and advancement in it for Joe. McCarthy could smell the aroma of this deal, but, like many a shabbez goy before him, he imagined he could out-fox the Jew. When the time came, he would use the publicity and backing to drag out ALL the Communists, Jew and Gentile alike.

So Joe agreed to conduct the great hunt and began in Wheeling, West Virginia. He promised to identify the "master Red agent" in America, and made a lot of charges about Communism in the State Department.
George Sokolsky
Then he was approached by his "good Jew" friend, George Sokolsky, the columnist, who warned him of the danger of being accused of being an "anti-Semite," because of the "fortuitous" presence of so many Jews in the Communist apparatus. "Why not guard against this by taking a 'good' Jew on as head of your staff?" wheedled George. "Then they couldn't say you were anti-Semitic!"
Joe thought this advice was pretty good and George just "happened" to have in mind the right Jew -- Roy Cohn. The matter was soon arranged and Cohn the Jew became the organizer of "McCarthyism."*
Then Cohn approached fighting Joe and suggested that, since they needed contributions and more help, and wanted to be doubly sure they would not be accused of "anti-Semitism," it might be wise to hire a wonderful, rich young Jew friend of his, Dave Schine, for the staff. Again, McCarthy went along with this brilliant stroke.

When all was in readiness, McCarthy duly brought out his "big red fish," as promised, which turned out to be a college professor named Owen Lattimore -- a Gentile! Nobody had heard much of him, before or since, but in the middle of the trials of more than twenty Jewish Soviet spies, Lattimore was dragged back and forth in the press as the real red herring, a Gentile herring, with suitable screaming back and forth by both "sides." Bernie had done a fine job.

McCarthy, through all of this, figured he was smarter than his manipulators and, when a Republican got into power, he would then go after ALL the reds, Jew and Gentile, and let the chips fall where they might. However, for the moment, he rested on his laurels as the man the Jew papers and the Communist Daily Worker were screaming about, the man who had been set up by a Jew, advised by a Jew, and staffed by two Jews.

The loyal and hard-working staff now set about displaying "McCarthyism" to the world. Cohn and Schine, the two Jews, made a whirlwind tour of Europe, visiting libraries of the U.S. Information Service which are, as a matter of fact, loaded with red and pink propaganda. But they did not do a responsible job exposing and stopping this rotten use of U.S. taxpayers' money to spread Marxism. Instead, they threw tantrums for the press, threw books on the floor and acted like two idiots. Nobody noticed that they were two Jews, but everybody came to equate "McCarthyism" with insanity, thanks to the wide press coverage these two received! 

The presidential election was now in full swing and McCarthy went to bat for Ike, dreaming sneakily of the day he would not have Truman to stop him -- the day he could really dig out Communists, no matter how many of them were Jews! Sure enough, Ike was elected and McCarthy pulled the plug, floored the accelerator, touched off the boosters and let go with all he had.

He went to Fort Monmouth, to our most secret radar laboratories and discovered 41 people with atrocious security records and red backgrounds. Of these 41, 39 were Jews! Then he found a Jew dentist named Irving Peress, who had been caught red-handed committing perjury in denying his red record. McCarthy asked the Defense Department to look into it and report the circumstances. Instead of doing this, the Anna Rosenberg-dominated Army promoted Peress and mustered him out, beyond reach of court-martial -- in one day!

McCarthy, righteously lusting for blood, went after Irving and demanded to know who promoted this Communist. He would have eventually found his way to Anna, the writer of articles for The New Masses and a member of a Communist John Reed Club. Perhaps the trail would have led him up to Secretary Marshall, who boasted that he personally disarmed the Nationalist Chinese with a stroke of his pen, thus turning China over to Communism.

So McCarthy's two Jew "assistants," Cohn and Schine, went into action again. Schine was drafted into the Army and Cohn, in McCarthy's name, called and tried to obtain favors for him by influence. This corrupt action was a perfect red herring to take the heat off those who promoted a Communist Jew dentist, guilty of perjury, and who mustered him out before he could be court-martialed.

Once more, the two Jews who had created "McCarthyism" and given it a bad reputation -- not Joe McCarthy -- were the source of dirty dealing which caused the downfall of a truly brave and great-hearted man.

When Hooker had finished this utterly devastating and unanswerable display of the manipulative genius of the Jews, and his own genius at figuring it out, I was staggered by the enormity of it all![Rockwell, This Time the World, ch. XI]

_____________________________
* Rockwell gives an oversimplified chronology here. It was only after the election of 1952, when the Republicans won a majority in the Senate and McCarthy became chairman of the Senate's Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, that Roy Cohn and G. David Schine were added to McCarthy's staff. Thus, although Cohn played the key role in McCarthy's downfall, it is inaccurate to suggest that Cohn was from the beginning the organizer of McCarthyism. McCarthyism was launched with a speech on 9 February 1950, and for some time McCarthy enjoyed considerable popular support. The role of Cohn and Schine was to draw McCarthy into embarrassing conflicts after 1952. 

Upload MP3 and download MP3 using free MP3 hosting from Tindeck. 

01 November 2013

Desensitization Therapy for the Public

Paul Dutton of Cambridge, England says that he has been shopping twice a week for three years at Asda -- wearing an SS dress-uniform.

Finally somebody complained about it, with the result that Mr. Dutton was escorted out of the store,  but for three years shoppers were habituated to the fact that a man wearing a swastika was mild-mannered and harmless. 

In his reaction to being given the bum's rush, Mr. Dutton remained mild-mannered: "I've shopped in Asda since the place was opened twice a week, this is how Asda repay me for my loyalty." 

Now, it may be that Mr. Dutton is a bit peculiar, but this action considered just in itself, is effective desensitization, tending to erode the effect of decades of conditioning. If you can arrange for people to see some forbidden symbol or hear some taboo utterance on a regular basis, it is good to do so, using discretion about how far you can go without incurring a severe reaction. 


How much you can do safely will depend on factors like the depth of respect for freedom of speech where you happen to be, whether there happens to be a degree of local sympathy for your speech, and whether you are perceived as dangerous apart from your actual speech: a man who is perceived as dangerous will have less freedom because of it. For maximum freedom of expression, you must appear harmless.

Paul Dutton has shown that for people who do maintain a mild demeanor, there is considerable leeway for expression in the UK that nobody uses.

If a swastika is too much for you where you live, maybe you could display a Confederate battle flag (which has tacit popular support in much of the USA), just to show that somebody is not intimidated, and to show others that they don't need to feel intimidated either.

The reaction that Mr. Dutton incurred, being told in effect that he can't wear his uniform in that store anymore after three years of doing so, is far from ruinous, and meanwhile he has probably done some good with his three-year stint as the harmless SS-man.

By contrast, people who don swastikas for the purpose of spouting overheated verbiage and general scary posturing tend to reinforce stereotypes. Don't do that.

As a matter of fact, if you intend to engage in rational communication about political ideas, it is better not to use a swastika or any shocking symbol, because it will tend to stop people from thinking about what you are saying, and of course it increases the difficulty of having one's ideas taken seriously. For maximum credibility, national-socialist ideas should be articulated by somebody who appears fundamentally mainstream.

But if you are in a situation where you have no intention of discussing anything, perhaps at a state university where you have other things to do than devote your time to political discussion,where such discussion would mean being dragged into endless arguments with people who share none of your interests, a symbol can be a good substitute for speech, just to demonstrate that you have the right to your view.